Home Search Contact Us
 
 

DRUG ON THE RADAR

Some FDA Approved Important Obstetrics Drugs: Their Effects On Mother And Baby

FDA APPROVED OBSTETRICS DRUGS:
THEIR EFFECTS ON MOTHER AND BABY

(Thanks: Doris Haire, President, American Foundation for Maternal and Child Health and Chair, Committee on Maternal and Child Health, National Women's Health Alliance)

FDA USES ITS OWN DEFINITION OF SAFE
Most Americans, including many health care providers, assume that if the FDA approves a drug for marketing then the FDA has determined that drug is free from harm or injury to the person receiving the drug. They do not know that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bases its approval of a drug on whether, in the Agency's opinion, the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks. Unfortunately the FDA has no way of knowing the true incidence of risk to the patient because there is no law or regulation that requires a doctor or other health care provider to report an adverse drug reaction to the FDA, even if the patient dies.


NO WRITTEN FDA STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING DRUG SAFETY
The Director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) acknowledges that the FDA has no written standards for evaluating or documenting the safety of drugs approved for use in obstetric care. The Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS), formerly accepted as a reliable tool for evaluating the neurologic state of the infant, has now been found to be unreliable.


LITTLE MORE THAN A DOZEN DRUGS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY FDA FOR USE IN OBSTETRIC CARE and more than half of these drugs have had their FDA approved labeling removed from the PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE (PDR) by their manufacturers.

The manufacturers of these drugs apparently prefer that the information regarding the inherent risks of these drugs be withheld from convenient review by health care providers and consumers.


WHAT IS THE PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE (PDR) and WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? The PDR is the only publication that must publish the text of an FDA approved label of a drug exactly as it appears in the drug's package insert.
All other printed sources of drug information can, if they choose, omit mention of risks. The fact that a manufacturer can choose to omit the label of his product from the PDR points to the need for a Federal pharmacopeia that includes the labels of all drugs approved by the FDA.
At the end of this document we have listed some of the drugs that are NOT FDA approved for use in obstetric care, but are nevertheless used for that purpose.
We have also provided a Glossary, defining technical terms you may read in the labeling of the drugs you are offered.
To insure your safety and that of your family it is important that you understand that:
• The FDA acknowledges that there is major underreporting of adverse drug effects, so neither the FDA nor the public has any way of knowing how frequently adverse drug effects occur. As a consequence, few women realize the inherent risks of oxytocic drugs to themselves and their babies.
NONE of the drugs used in obstetric care has been proven safe for the fetus exposed to the drug in utero. None of the pharmaceutical manufacturers of those drugs approved by the FDA for use in obstetrics has carried out periodic neurological examinations of children exposed to their drug products in utero. The FDA has not required companies to provide such data.
Most drugs approved by the FDA have never been tested on women.
• The FDA acknowledges that drugs trapped in the infant's brain at birth have the potential to adversely effect the rapidly developing nerve circuitry of the brain and central nervous system by altering:
a) the rate at which the nerve cells in the brain mature;
b) the process by which the brain cells develop individual characteristics and capacity to carry out specific function;
c) the process by which the brain cells are guided into their proper place within the brain and central nervous system;
d) the interconnection of the branch-like nerve fibers as the circuitry of the brain is formed; and
e) the forming of the insulating sheath of myelin (fat-like) substance around the nerve fibers which help to assure that the nerve impulses - the messages to and from the brain - will travel their normal routes at the normal rate of speed.


• Research now confirms that the migration of neurons along the fibers within the brain can be altered by changing the normal chemistry of the rapidly developing brain. Yet the FDA does not require, as part of the approval process, that the manufacturer of a drug to be approved for obstetric use commit to carrying out a follow-up study to determine the delayed, long-term effects of the drug on the neurologic development of offspring exposed to the drug in utero.
Health care providers often state that the predominant cause of neurologic impairment in children occurs before labor begins. There is no scientific documentation for this statement.
Please take the time to read "Just How Safe Is 'Safe': How the FDA Determines the 'Safety' of Drugs", also at this web site, to understand why one cannot assume that the FDA approval of a drug means that the drug is free from harm or injury to the mother or her baby.
 

As you read the information in this document keep in mind that:
• Virtually all drugs administered to the mother, including oxytocin, rapidly filter across the placental membranes and enter the blood, brain and other major organs of the fetus within minutes of administration to the mother during pregnancy, labor and birth. There is no such thing as a placental "barrier".
• There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies carried out to determine if this drug may cause fetal harm or damage to the developing fetal brain if administered to a pregnant woman.
• The idea that a maternally administered drug, chemical or food additive can harm the fetus only during the period of organogenesis (the first three months of pregnancy) is scientifically inaccurate.
• As the time of birth nears, the fetal brain is relatively large and rich in blood vessels, and the cerebral blood flow is relatively high in comparison with that of the adult brain. These factors increase the transfer of drugs given to the mother to the fetal circulation, brain and central nervous system. If drugs slow the fetal heart rate and the oxygen saturation of the fetal blood is depleted below the physiologic level, the transfer of drugs administered to the mother, and hence to the fetus, is increased. The one minute APGAR score and the newborn's time to sustained respiration are important barometers of how the fetus fared in utero.
• The fact that the fetal brain's myelin content, the fat-like substance that protects the nerve fibers of the brain, is low when compared with that of the adult brain, makes the fetal and newborn brain and central nervous system more vulnerable to the effects of a drug taken by or administered to the mother.
• The gestational age, the condition of the fetus, and the simultaneous exposure of the fetus to other drugs can influence the ways in which a drug given to the mother affects the unborn or newborn baby.
• A six week follow up of newborn infants in the U.K. found that bupivacaine, administered in the form of an epidural block, adversely altered brain function in a significant number of newborn infants throughout the six week testing period. A subsequent evaluation in the U.S. found essentially the same results.
CHECK THE OFFICIAL FDA LABEL OF THE DRUG
• To check whether or not a drug has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of your condition ask your pharmacist or doctor for a copy of the drug's official "package insert", or read the FDA approved label in the PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE (PDR).


MANY DRUGS ARE USED "OFF-LABEL".
• "Off-label" is pharmaceutical jargon meaning that the drug is being used to treat a condition for which the FDA has NOT approved the drug for that treatment. Terbutaline, for example, has not been approved by the FDA to treat premature contractions, yet the drug is frequently used "off label" to treat the condition, rather than use Ritodrine, which has been approved for such treatment.
• Please see the list of drugs frequently used off-label by physicians and other health care providers in the care of maternity patients.
ALWAYS READ THE "INDICATIONS" SECTION OF THE PACKAGE INSERT FIRST
• If, for example, the words "obstetrics", "pregnancy", "labor", "delivery", or "lactation" are NOT mentioned in the INDICATIONS section of the package insert, the FDA has NOT approved the drug for use under those conditions.
If those conditions are mentioned elsewhere in the text, such as for example, under "Labor and Delivery", that does not mean that the drug has been approved by the FDA for such use


There are many drugs given to or administered to pregnant women that are not approved for such use by the FDA. While drugs such as codeine, morphine, hydromorphone, promethazine, codeine, fentanyl citrate, phenergan, terbutaline, etc, are sometimes used "off label" in obstetric care, they have not been approved by the FDA for obstetric use.


• No drug should be administered to a woman during pregnancy, labor and birth, unless the woman is fully informed of the known risks and the relevant areas of uncertainty regarding the effects of the drug on the physiologic and neurologic development of the woman or her baby. Whenever possible non-technical terms are used to help you and your health care provider discuss the risks as well as the advantages of the drug in question.
• If you have any questions about the drugs listed below, call the manufacturer of that drug and ask to be sent a copy of the package insert for the drug in question. Drug companies, as well as patients, benefit when patients understand the risks, as well as the benefits, of the drugs they are considering. Manufacturers are not accustomed to answering consumer requests for information, so be polite, but firm in your questions.


NORMAL BLOOD GASES AT BIRTH ARE NO GUARANTEE NEWBORN IS UNSCATHED
Research in animals has found that cord occlusion resulting in short periods of oxygen depletion in the fetus can cause neuronal damage in the offspring that is not reflected by the blood gases measured in the newborn animal. Follow up of animals exposed to such brief periods of occlusion indicates that there is often a subsequent progressive decline in function.
Research in newborn infants has shown that a drop in fetal heart rate during labor, which reflects a drop in fetal oxygenation, correlates with evidence of CPK enzymes in the newborn's blood indicating damage to the brain, heart and tissue.
The FDA does not require pharmaceutical manufacturers to advise the physician or the patient if the use of a product is likely to precipitate the need for cascade of obstetrical interventions such as intravenous infusion, catheterization, chemical stimulation of labor, artificial rupture of membranes, cesarean section, episiotomy (incision to enlarge the vaginal opening), fundal pressure (external pressure on the uterus), forceps or vacuum extraction, uterine atony and hemorrhage) or surgical correction to correct postpartum urinary or fecal incontinence.
Nor does the FDA require a drug manufacturer to note in the drug label if the drug is likely to precipitate (a) fetal hypoxia, (b) fetal bradycardia or tachycardia (slowing or speeding of the fetal heart rate), (c) tentorial hemorrhage (blood covering the brain), (d) newborn resuscitation, (e) Erb's Palsy, (f) newborn jaundice, or (g) the need to perform a spinal tap on the newborn to rule out meningitis.


YOUR PHYSICIAN OR OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS ARE LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO ADVISE YOU OF DRUG RISKS AND TO OBTAIN YOUR INFORMED CONSENT PRIOR TO TREATMENT and you have an obligation to tell the doctor if you know you are pregnant.
FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF DRUGS APPROVED BY THE FDA FOR USE DURING SOME, BUT NOT ALL, OBSTETRIC PROCEDURES.

This document is to assist the reader in identifying the specific FDA approved uses of the drugs listed below and to help the reader understand the risks to both the mother and her baby inherent in their use. For your protection, and that of your family, make sure you understand the risks and let your doctor or other health care providers know whether you wish to accept or forgo the drugs being offered to you.


Each drug is listed alphabetically by its brand name, the generic (chemical) name, and the name of the drug's manufacturer. If the drug is also manufactured by other pharmaceutical companies, we have also noted their names.


If possible, we have included the full name and mailing address of the pharmaceutical company and the telephone number to call for information. Many companies have chosen to remove their label information, their address and their telephone number from the PDR, so we will make them available to the public as soon as they become available to us.

BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
FDA approved Marcaine for use in labor and delivery.
For information see the MARCAINE entry below.
DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long term effects of Bupivacaine on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Bupivacaine in utero
Dinoprostone PGE2
LABEL IS IN THE PDR, PAGE 1261
Approved by FDA as a cervical ripener in patients at or near term in whom there is a medical or obstetrical indication for the induction of labor.
It is NOT approved for the elective induction of labor, when there is no medical reason for the induction.

Dinoprostone vaginal insert is a thin flat, rectangular polymeric slab with a long tape to serve as a retrieval system. Dinoprostone is inserted into the vagina in order to "ripen" the cervix. The patient must remain in the recumbent position for two hours after insertion. The drug gradually causes the rigid cervix to become softened, yielding and dilated to allow passage of the fetus through the birth canal.


The use of Dinoprostone is not without risk. Therefore the drug should only be administered by trained obstetrical personnel in a hospital setting with appropriate obstetrical care facilities. Since Dinoprostone is a prostaglandin that can augment the activity of oxytocic drugs, the two drugs should not be administered at the same time. Dinoprostone must be removed before oxytocin administration is initiated and the patient's uterine activity must be carefully monitored for uterine hyperstimulation. The label also notes that uterine hyperstimulation, sustained uterine contraction, fetal distress, or other fetal or maternal adverse reactions should be a cause for consideration of removal of the insert.


Dinoprostone should not be administered to women with a history of previous cesarean section or uterine surgery in light of the potential risks for uterine rupture and associated obstetrical complication. If uterine hyperstimulation is encountered, or if labor commences, the vaginal insert should be removed. Dinoprostone should also be removed prior to amniotomy (the artificial rupture of membranes). If the mother's membranes have ruptured, the chemical stimulation of contractions can increase fetal intracranial pressure. Dinoprostone is contraindicated when prolonged contractions of the uterus may be detrimental to uterine integrity and fetal safety.


During a normal contraction the maternal blood vessels that carry oxygenated blood through the uterine wall to the placenta are constricted. During these periods of diminished blood flow the oxygen in the mother's blood, stored up in the placenta's intervillous space between contractions, maintains the fetal brain with a relatively constant supply of oxygen. Any uterine stimulant or drug which foreshortens these oxygen-replenishing intervals between contractions, by making the contractions too long, too strong, or too close together, increases the likelihood that fetal brain cells will be adversely affected. Uterine activity, fetal status and the progression of cervical dilatation and effacement should be carefully monitored.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long term effects of Dinoprostone on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Dinoprostone in utero

Meperidine
Approved by FDA for obstetrical analgesia
Meperidine called Pethidine in Europe, is a narcotic analgesic used to relieve moderate to severe pain. The drug has multiple actions similar to those of morphine. Demerol crosses the placenta and enters the fetal circulation, brain and other organs within minutes of administration to the mother. Demerol also appears in breast milk.


The major risks of Meperidine, as with other narcotic analgesics, are respiratory distress, circulatory depression, respiratory arrest, shock and cardiac arrest. Overdose of Meperidine can result in hypertension, severe respiratory depression, cyanosis, coma and death. Therapeutic doses of Meperidine have occasionally precipitated unpredictable, severe and occasionally fatal reaction in patients who have received such agents within 14 days. Other adverse reactions noted in the label/package insert are hyperexcitability, convulsions, bradycardia or tachycardia (slowing or speeding of the fetal heart), hyperpyrexia (high fever), hypertension or hypotension (high or low blood pressure), coma, severe respiratory depression, and cyanosis (bluish discoloration of skin due to diminished oxygen).


If Meperidine is given intravenously, the injection should be given very slowly, preferably in the form of a diluted solution. Rapid intravenous injection of narcotic analgesics, including Meperidine, increases the incidence of adverse reactions such as severe respiratory depression, apnea, hypotension, peripheral circulatory collapse and cardiac arrest. Meperidine should not be administered intravenously unless a narcotic antagonist and the facilities for assisted or controlled respiration are immediately available.


The package insert states that the major hazards of Meperidine, as with other narcotic analgesics, are respiratory depression, circulatory depression, respiratory arrest, shock and cardiac arrest.


Under "Nervous System" the package insert cites adverse effects such as euphoria, dysphoria, weakness, headache, agitation, tremor, uncoordinated muscle movements, severe convulsions, transient hallucination and disorientation, and visual disturbances. The inadvertent injection of the drug about a nerve trunk may result in sensory-motor paralysis which is usually, but not always, transitory.
Under "Cardiovascular" the package insert cites adverse effects such as tachycardia, bradycardia, palpitation, hypertension, syncope, and phlebitis following intravenous injection.


Urinary retention and pruritus (itching) are also noted by the manufacturer.


FETAL EFFECTS:
The FDA has allowed the manufacturer to imply, by the following ambiguous paragraph, that Meperidine has been proven safe for the fetus when administered to the mother during labor. Under Usage in Pregnancy and Lactation the package insert states:


"Meperidine should not be used in pregnant women prior to the labor period unless in the judgment of the physician the potential benefits outweigh the possible hazards, because safe use in pregnancy prior to labor has not been established relative to possible adverse effect on fetal development. When used as an obstetrical analgesic, Meperidine crosses the placental barrier (editor's note: the placenta is not a barrier) and can produce depression of respiration and psychophysiologic function in the newborn. Resuscitation may be required."


The manufacturer does not describe in the package insert the type of psychophysiologic dysfunctions that may be precipitated when the fetus is exposed in utero to Meperidine during labor and delivery. The ambiguity of the statement arises from the fact the drug has never been subjected to a long-term, scientifically controlled follow-up to evaluate the effect of the drug on the subsequent neurologic development of the offspring exposed to the drug during labor and delivery.


Meperidine rapidly filters across the placental membranes and enters the blood, brain and other organs of the fetus within seconds or minutes of administration to the mother. Drug induced alterations in the brain chemistry of the fetus can cause the fetal heart to slow or to speed up to non-physiological levels. The drug's official label notes that Meperidine, like all pain relieving drugs, tends to increase cerebral spinal fluid pressure.
We have no way of knowing how frequently these adverse effects occur under normal clinical conditions because, as mentioned earlier, the law does not require physicians or other health care providers to report adverse drug reactions to the FDA, even if the patient dies.


The FDA has allowed the manufacturers of Meperidine to provide only a minimum of information in the label in regard to the drug's adverse effects on the fetus and newborn infant. The label acknowledges that the drug does cross the placenta and can increase the likelihood that the newborn infant will require resuscitation. However, the label does not make it clear that:
(a) Meperidine given to the mother during labor can impede the normal transfer of oxygen from the mother's circulation to that of her fetus,
(b) Prolonged oxygen depletion can cause the fetal brain to swell,
(c) The drug can interfere with the newborn infant's normal ability to self- regulate his/her internal temperature, or
(d) A severely narcotized newborn infant is more prone to aspirate its gastric fluids if the drug has blunted or paralyzed his protective gag reflex.
DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Demerol on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Demerol in utero or during lactation

MARCAINE (Bupivacaine)
FDA approved Marcaine for use in labor and delivery.
The FDA approved labeling for Bupivacaine (Marcaine) reads:


LABOR AND DELIVERY: Local anesthetics rapidly cross the placenta, and when used for epidural, caudal or pudendal block anesthesia, can cause varying degrees of maternal, fetal and neonatal toxicity... Adverse reactions in the parturient, fetus and neonate involve alteration of the central nervous system, peripheral vascular tone and cardiac function..."


Under "ADVERSE REACTIONS: Neurologic" the official labeling continues:
"Neurologic effects following epidural or caudal anesthesia may include spinal block of varying magnitude (including high or total spinal block); hypotension secondary to spinal block; urinary retention; fecal and urinary incontinence; loss of perineal sensation and sexual function; persistent anesthesia, paresthesia, weakness, paralysis of the lower extremities and loss of sphincter control all of which may have slow, incomplete, or no recovery; headache; backache; septic meningitis; meningismus; slowing of labor; increased incidence of forceps delivery; and cranial nerve palsies due to traction on nerves from loss of cerebrospinal fluid.....Neurologic effects following other procedures or routes of administration may include persistent anesthesia, paresthesia, weakness, paralysis, all of which may have slow, incomplete, or no recovery."


Epidural analgesia can cause disruptions in normal uterine function that cannot always be completely corrected by the use of oxytocin. The package insert does not mention that such disruption can precipitate the need for forceps or vacuum extraction of the baby, or the use of fundal pressure (external pressure applied to the mother's lower abdomen) to help push the baby out). Forceps and vacuum extraction carry risks to both mother and baby, as does fundal pressure. Fundal pressure increases the likelihood of uterine inversion, and that an episiotomy will be extended into a rectal tear. Fundal pressure has the potential to increase fetal intracranial pressure if the membranes have ruptured.


The incidence and degree of Bupivacaine toxicity depends on the (a) procedure performed, (b) type and amount of drug used, (c) technique of drug administration (d) gestational age of the fetus, (e) condition of the fetus, (f) and previous and concomitant exposure to other drugs. Relative hypoxia and various pathological conditions can affect how a drug given to the mother will affect her fetus during labor, birth and the infant's development following birth. Hypoxemia and a build up of lactic acid in the fetal blood during labor and birth can increase the uptake of a maternal drug by the fetal brain and heart.


Rosenblatt and her fellow investigators in Britain found that Bupivacaine administered to the mother during labor can have prolonged adverse effects on the early development of the exposed offspring. The investigators concluded:
"Significant and consistent effects of Bupivacaine throughout the assessment period can be demonstrated. Immediately after delivery, infants with greater exposure to Bupivacaine in utero were most likely to be cyanotic and unresponsive to their surroundings. Visual skills and alertness decreased significantly with increases in the cord blood concentration of Bupivacaine, particularly on the first day of life, but also throughout the next six weeks. Adverse effects of Bupivacaine levels on the infant's motor organization, his ability to control his own state of consciousness and his physiological response to stress were also observed."


A similar investigation carried out by Sepkoski, Brazelton and colleagues supports the earlier findings of Rosenblatt et al. See References at end of document.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies sponsored by Abbott to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Marcaine on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Marcaine in utero or during location
METHERGINE (Methylergonovine maleate)

Approved by the FDA for use only AFTER the delivery of the anterior (front) shoulder
Methergine acts directly on the smooth muscle of the uterus and increases the resting tone, rate and strength of uterine contractions. Methergine is used to induce a rapid and sustained spasmodic uterine contraction to shorten the third stage of labor and reduce blood loss.
The manufacturer of Methergine acknowledges that the drug can result in sudden and severe blockage of blood to the heart. The use of Methergine has diminished because of the drug's action to constrict blood vessels.


The label of Methergine warns against intravenous administration of the drug because of the possibility of inducing a sudden hypertensive or cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Under full obstetric supervision, Methergine may be given in the second stage of labor following delivery of the anterior (front) shoulder. The timing of Methergine administration is of upmost importance, since premature administration can cause the baby's body to become "trapped" by the constricting uterus, making the infant difficult to extract by forceps, vacuum extraction or manually.

The manufacturer of Methergine reports infrequent cases of acute myocardial infarction, transient chest pains, labored breathing, thrombophlebitis (inflammation of a vein resulting from the formation of a stationary blood clot along the wall of a blood vessel, hematuria (blood in the urine), water intoxication (an undue retention of water, marked by vomiting, depression of core temperature, convulsions; hallucinations, leg cramps, dizziness, tinnitus, diarrhea, profuse sweating; irregular heart rate, and coma.

The official label of Methergine mentions that several infants have been accidentally injected with Methergine and that all but one infant recovered. The label provides no information as to the long term effects of the drug on the neurologic development of those infants injected with Methergine.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Methergine on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Methergine in utero
PITOCIN (oxytocin)

PITOCIN has been approved by the FDA for the medical induction and stimulation of labor. Pitocin has not approved for the elective induction or stimulation of labor.


Oxytocin crosses the placenta and enters the blood and brain of the fetus within seconds or minutes. There appears to be a correlation between fetal exposure to oxytocin and autism in the exposed offspring.


The manufacturer of oxytocin warns the provider in the package insert:
"Maternal deaths due to hypertensive episodes, subarachnoid hemorrhage, rupture of the uterus, fetal deaths and permanent CNS or brain damage of the infant due to various causes have been reported to be associated with the use of parenteral oxytocic drugs for induction of labor or for augmentation in the first and second stages of labor."


Because oxytocin is used so commonly to stimulate labor we note here that, in addition to the more benign effects of uterine stimulants, such as nausea and vomiting, the manufacturer of Pitocin (oxytocin) points out in its package insert that oxytocin can cause:
(a) Maternal hypertensive episodes (abnormally high blood pressure)
(b) Subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in area surrounding spinal cord) (c) anaphylactic reaction (exaggerated allergic reaction)
(d) Postpartum hemorrhage (uterine hemorrhage following birth)
(e) Cardiac arrhythmias (non-normal heart rate)
(f) Fatal afibrinogenemia (loss of blood clotting fibrin)
(g) Premature ventricular contraction(non-normal heart function)
(h) Pelvic hematoma (blood clot in the pelvic region)
(i) Uterine hypertonicity (excessive uterine muscle tone)
(j) Uterine spasm (violent, distorted contraction of the uterus)
(k) Tetanic contractions (spasmodic uterine contractions)
(l) Uterine rupture
(m) Increased blood loss
(n) Convulsions (violent, involuntary muscle contraction(s).
(o) Coma (unconsciousness that cannot be aroused)
(p) Fatal oxytocin-induced water intoxication (undue retention of water marked by vomiting, depression of temperature convulsions, and coma and may end in death.


Fetal and Newborn Effects
The following adverse effects of maternally administered oxytocin have been reported in the fetus or infant:
(a) Bradycardia (slow fetal heart rate)
(b) Premature ventricular contractions and other arrhythmias (non-normal heart function
(c) Low 5 minute Apgar scores (non-physiologic neurologic evaluation)
(d) Neonatal jaundice (excess bilirubin in the blood of the neonate.
(e) Neonatal retinal hemorrhage (hemorrhage within the innermost covering of the eyeball)
(f) Permanent central nervous system or brain damage
(g) Fetal death


Uterine stimulants which foreshorten the oxygen-replenishing intervals between contractions, by making the contractions too long, too strong, or too close together, increase the likelihood that fetal brain cells will die.


The situation is analogous to holding an infant under the surface of the water, allowing the infant to come to the surface to gasp for air, but not to breathe. All of these effects increase the possibility of neurologic insult to the fetus. No one really knows how often these adverse effects occur, because there is no law or regulation in any country which requires the doctor to report an adverse drug reaction to the FDA.


These findings underscore the importance of the midwife managing the woman's labor in a way that will avoid the need for Pitocin and the pain relieving drugs that are often administered to help the woman cope with the contractions intensified by Pitocin.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Pitocin on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Pitocin in utero or during lactation
RITODRINE
Approved by the FDA for use as a tocolytic agent to manage preterm labor in suitable patients.
When administered intravenously, Ritodrine will decrease uterine activity and prolong gestation in the majority of suitable patients. Intravenous infusion of 0.05 to 0.30 mg/min or single oral doses of 10 to 20 mg/min decrease the intensity and frequency of uterine contractions.


Ritodrine Hydrochloride, once sold under the brand name Yytopar, is the only tocolytic drug approved by the FDA to forestall premature labor. The manufacturer cautions that IV administration of Ritodrine should be supervised by persons having knowledge of the pharmacology of the drug and who are qualified to identify and manage complications of drug administration and pregnancy. Beta-adrenergic drugs such as Ritodrine increase cardiac output. Even in a normal healthy heart this added demand can lead to a reduction in the flow of oxygenated blood to the myocardial muscle - the major muscle in the heart. This disruption in blood flow can result in myocardial necrosis (death of heart muscle); non-physiological heart rates, such as arrhythmias, atrial and ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia; and heart pain, with or without EEG changes. Because cardiovascular responses are common and more pronounced during intravenous administration of Ritodrine, cardiovascular effects, including maternal pulse rate and blood pressure and fetal heart rate, should be closely monitored.


The label of Ritodrine notes that pulmonary edema (accumulation of fluid in the lungs) has been reported in patients treated with Ritodrine and cautions that patients must be closely monitored in the hospital, and sometimes after the delivery of the infant. Maternal death from this condition has been reported.
Ritodrine contains sodium metabisulfite, a sulfite which may cause an allergic-type reaction, including serious allergic symptoms that can become life-threatening.


When Ritodrine is used for the management of preterm labor in a patient with premature rupture of the membranes, the benefits of delaying delivery should be balanced against the potential risks of development of chorioamnionitis (inflammation of fetal membranes).
Ritodrine crosses the placenta, enters the fetal circulation, brain and other major fetal organs. How this alteration of brain chemistry affects the neurologic development of the exposed offspring is unknown. The label of Ritodrine notes that neonatal symptoms of hypoglycemia and ileus (intestinal obstruction due to inhibition of bowel motility) are infrequently reported. Although clinical studies did not demonstrate a risk of permanent adverse fetal affects from Ritodrine, the possibility cannot be excluded; therefore, Ritodrine should be used only when clearly indicated.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Ritodrine on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Ritodrine in utero

SCOPOLAMINE HYDROBROMIDE
APPROVED FOR USE IN OBSTETRICS

Scopolamine is a sedative and tranquilizing depressant to the central nervous system. The drug can produce restlessness, hallucinations, or delirium, especially in the presence of severe pain.
The manufacturer advises in the label that Scopolamine crosses the placenta and that use during labor may cause respiratory depression in the neonate, and that Scopolamine may contribute to neonatal hemorrhage due to a drug induced reduction in the clotting factor (fibrin) in the neonates blood.
 

DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Scopolamine on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Scopolamine in utero

Sufentanil citrate
Sufentanil is FDA approved for epidural administration as an analgesic combined with low dose Bupivacaine during labor and vaginal delivery.
SUFENTANILNIL CITRATE
Sufentanil is a potent opioid. The drug can produce muscular rigidity that involves the skeletal muscles of the neck, trunk and the extremities. The manufacturer warns that skeletal muscle rigidity is related to the dose and speed of administration of Sufentanil. The drug can cause respiratory drive to decrease and airway resistance to increase. At high doses, a pronounced decrease in pulmonary exchange and apnea (transient cessation of breathing) may be produced.


The FDA approved label/package insert of Sufentanil cautions that the drug should be administered incrementally and that the proper placement of the needle or catheter in the epidural space is essential. The intravascular injection of Sufentanil can result in a serious overdose including acute muscular rigidity in the trunk area, and apnea (impaired respiration). A intrathecal injection of the full Sufentanil/Bupivacaine epidural dose and volume can result in a serious overdose, including acute truncal muscular rigidity and apnea that can, in turn, produce effects of high spinal anesthesia including prolonged paralysis and delayed recovery and death.


The FDA approved Sufentanil label cautions:
(a) That the drug should be administered only by persons specifically trained in the use of intravenous and epidural anesthetics and the management of the respiratory effects of potent opioids.
(b) That an opioid antagonist, resuscitative and intubation equipment and oxygen should be readily available, and
(c) That the facility should be fully equipped to handle all degrees of respiratory depression, and provide for post operative monitoring and ventilation of

patients administered Sufentanil. Muscular rigidity has been reported to occur or recur infrequently in the extended postoperative period.


The label advises that (a) the most serious and significant effect of an overdose of Sufentanil is respiratory depression, (b) that the intravenous administration of an opioid antagonist such as naloxone should be employed as a specific antidote to manage respiratory depression, and (c) that respiratory depression can recur in the postoperative period.


The patient must be carefully and continuously monitored since the duration of respiratory depression produced by Sufentanil may last longer than the countering effects of the opioid antagonist. If the patient's gag reflex continues to be blunted by the opioid after the effects of the opioid antagonist has worn off, there is increasing possibility that the patient may aspirate her stomach contents, which could result in neurologic injury or death.
Respiratory depression may be intensified when Sufentanil is administered in combination with volatile inhalation agents and or other central nervous system depressants such as barbiturates, tranquilizers, and other opioids.


Indwelling catheters appear to be standard with the use of epidural Sufentanil in order to avoid urinary retention. The return of normal bladder activity may be delayed.


The manufacturer of Sufentanil states that there are insufficient data to critically evaluate the effects of Sufentanil on the neuromuscular and adaptive capacity of the neonate following recommended doses of maternally administered epidural Sufentanil with Bupivacaine. If larger than recommended doses are used for combined local and systemic analgesia during delivery, the impaired neonatal response to sound and light can be detected for 1-4 hours and if a dose of 80 mg is used, impaired neuromuscular coordination can be detected for more than 4 hours.


DELAYED LONG TERM EFFECTS: There have been no adequate and well-controlled studies to determine the delayed, long-term effects of Sufentanil on pregnant women, or on the neurologic, as well as general, development of children exposed to Sufentanil in utero or during lactation
 

 

Trimethylglycine

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Trimethylglycine (TMG), also called betaine, is a substance manufactured by the body. It helps break down another naturally occurring substance called homocysteine.

 

In certain rare genetic conditions, the body cannot dispose of homocysteine, resulting in its accumulation to extremely high levels. This, in turn, leads to accelerated cardiovascular disease and other problems. Oral TMG is an FDA-approved treatment for this condition. It "methylates" homocysteine, removing it from circulation.

 

Meaningful, but not altogether consistent, evidence suggests that the relatively slight elevation of homocysteine that can occur in healthy people is also harmful.6  On this basis, it has been suggested that TMG might reduce heart disease risk in healthy people as well. However, this has not been proven, and TMG has shown the potential for having adverse effects on cholesterol profile, which could counter any possible benefit via homocysteine.

 

Note: TMG is similar chemically to betaine hydrochloride, but it has entirely different actions.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Sources

TMG is not required in the diet because the body can manufacture it from other nutrients. Grains, nuts, seeds, and meats contain small amounts of TMG. However, most TMG in food is destroyed during cooking or processing, so food isn't a reliable way to get a therapeutic dosage.

 

After TMG has done its work on homocysteine, it is turned into another substance, dimethylglycine (DMG). Some manufacturers will tell you that DMG is identical to TMG, but this isn't true. DMG is not a methylating agent, so it can't have any effect on homocysteine. (See also Therapeutic Uses below.)

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Therapeutic Dosages

Optimal therapeutic dosages of TMG are not known. Common recommendations range from 375 to 3,000 mg daily.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Therapeutic Uses

There is no doubt that TMG greatly reduces homocysteine levels and improves health among people with the rare disease cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency (as well as related conditions).1  TMG also appears to reduce relatively mild homocysteine elevations in people without genetic defects.10-11  However, as noted above, TMG also seems to worsen cholesterol profile, and this may counteract any possible benefits.12  For this reason, if you have elevated levels of homocysteine, it may make more sense to reduce it by taking supplemental folate, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12; these supplements are known to reduce homocysteine levels, and, unlike TMG, they provide nutritional benefit as well.

 

TMG may help protect the liver against the effects of alcohol, perhaps by stimulating the formation of SAMe.2,3,4,7  In addition, it may be helpful for non-alcoholic forms of fatty liver (non-alcoholic steatosis) as well.8,9 

 

TMG has also been suggested as a less expensive substitute for SAMe in other condition for which SAMe is used (such as osteoarthritis and depression). However, there is no evidence to show that it is effective.

 

A substance labeled pangamic acid or vitamin B 15 has been extensively used as a performance enhancer by Russian athletes and has also become popular among American athletes. However, it is not clear there really is any such substance; or, to state it another way, various substances have at various times been given that name. Most recently, the term has been associated with a mixture of calcium gluconate and DMG; one small study failed to find this form of pangamic acid effective for enhancing sports performance.5 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Safety Issues

The only known safety issue with TMG is regarding cholesterol profile, as already mentioned. People with high or borderline-high cholesterol should use TMG only with caution.

 

Maximum safe dosages for young children, pregnant or nursing mothers, or those with severe liver or kidney disease have not been established.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

References[ - ]

1. Wilcken DEL, Dudman NPB, Tyrrell PA. Homocystinuria due to cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency—the effects of betaine treatment in pyridoxine-responsive patients. Metabolism. 1985;34:1115-1121.

 

2. Barak AJ, Beckenhauer HC, Tuma DJ. Betaine, ethanol and the liver: a review. Alcohol. 1996;13:395-398.

 

3. Barak AJ, Beckenhauer HC, Junnila M, et al. Dietary betaine promotes generation of hepatic S-adenosylmethionine and protects the liver from ethanol-induced fatty infiltration. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993;17:552-555.

 

4. Murakami T, Nagamura Y, Hirano K. The recovering effect of betaine on carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 1998;44:249-255.

 

5. Gray ME, Titlow LW. The effect of pangamic acid on maximal treadmill performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:424-427.

 

6. Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: current evidence and future prospects. Am J Med. 2002;112:556-565.

 

7. Kanbak G, Inal M, Baycu C. Ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity and protective effect of betaine. Cell Biochem Funct. 2001;19:281-285.

 

8. Abdelmalek MF, Angulo P, Jorgensen RA, et al. Betaine, a promising new agent for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2711-2717.

 

9. Angulo P, Lindor KD. Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver: present and emerging therapies. Semin Liver Dis. 2001;21:81-188.

 

10. Schwab U, Torronen A, Meririnne E et al. Orally administered betaine has an acute and dose-dependent effect on serum betaine and plasma homocysteine concentrations in healthy humans. J Nutr. 2005;136:34-38.

 

11. Olthof MR, Van Vliet T, Boelsma E et al. Low dose betaine supplementation leads to immediate and long term lowering of plasma homocysteine in healthy men and women. J Nutr. 2003;133:4135-4138.

 

12. Olthof MR, Vliet TV, Verhoef P et al. Effect of homocysteine-lowering nutrients on blood lipids: results from four randomised, placebo-controlled studies in healthy humans. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e135.

  

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents for Diabetes in Pregnancy- An Appraisal of the Current Evidence for Oral Anti-Diabetic Drug Use in Pregnancy

 

Francis LW Ho, MD,

Choon-Fong Liew, MBBS (Lond) FAMS (Endocrinol,)

Elaine C Cunanan, MD,

 

Introduction:

 

            Tight blood glucose control has always been emphasized in the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes to increase the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes to increase the likelihood of successful pregnancy outcomes. Studies have documented that uncontrolled diabetes in pregnancy increases the incidence of congenital anomalies form 2% to 3% in non-diabetic women to around 7% to 9%.” However, most clinicians have been limited to the use of insulin in controlling the blood sugar levels in this group of patients because it has been the drug deemed absolutely safe for use in pregnancy.

 

            The major concerns regarding the use of oral hypoglycemic drugs in pregnancy have been fetal anomalies, neonatal hypoglycemia and the development of pre-eclampsia. Studies done by Smithberg and Smoke on mice showed that first-generation sulphonylureas, such as tolbutamide and chlorpropamide, were associated with congenital malformations. Similarly, Denno and Sadler also sowed that phenformin was embryotoxic in rats, and metformin was associated with a delay in neural tube closure and reduced yolk sac protein values.  There are also case reports of congenital malformations associated with the use of, or exposure to, oral hypoglycemic agents in human pregnancy. However, in a randomized study done by Notelovitz in 1971 where he compared the use of tolbutamide, chlorpropamide, diet, and insulin in 208 subjects, there were no significant differences among the different groups in terms of perinatal mortality and congenial anomalies when glycaemic control was optimal. The author concluded that it was the poorly controlled glycaemic state that was associated with the development of fetal anomalies and note the agents used to control blood sugar levels.

 

            Neonatal hypoglycemia has been a concern with the use of oral hypoglycemic agents because Zucker and Simon found tolbutamide and chlorpropamide to cause profound and prolonged hyperinsulinemia hypoglycemia among neonates born to women who took these drugs during pregnancy. In fact, they found the cord-serum concentrations of chlorpropamide to be similar to those in maternal serum, and the half-life of the drug in infants was similar to that in their mothers. In another paper by Kimball et al, there were 4 patients with prolonged symptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia associated with maternal sulphonylurea drug usage. All 4 infants had evidence of increased and inappropriate insulin secretion, suggesting beta-cell hyperplasia, Of the 4 hypoglycemic infants, prolonged elimination of chlorpropamide was observed in 3 of them and chlorpropamide was detected up to 11 days after birth in these neonates.

 

            In a cohort study by Hellmujth et al consisting of 118 diabetic pregnant women on oral hypoglycemic agents, 50 of whom were treated with metformin and 68 with a sulfonylurea, the prevalence of pre-eclampsia was found to be significantly higher in the metformin group as compared  to  the sulphonylurea group ( 32% vs 7%, P<0.001).  The perinatal mortality was also noted to be significantly higher in the met forming group compared to  the sulphonylurea group 911.6 vs 1.3%, P<0.02).

 

            With all the findings in the studies mentioned, physicians have been hesitant in using oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnant women. However, more recent evidence and studies showing the efficacy and safety of oral agents in pregnancy suggest that the use of these agents for gestational diabetes should be re-examined.

 

Glibenclamide (Glyburide):

 

            Differences in placental transfer of the different sulphonylureas were first documented by Elliot et al using a single human placental cotyledon perfusion model to study drug transfer between maternal and fetal circulation.  Tolbutamide was found to diffuse across the placenta freely. However, there was no significant transport of glibenclamide in the maternal –to-fetal and fetal- to maternal directions. Even increasing the glibenclamide concentration to 100 times the therapeutic level did not alter transport significantly. Glibenclamide remained undetected when cord blood was analyzed using high- performance liquid chromatography. At least- 99.8 % of the glibenclamide was bound to protein so it was neither metabolized nor appropriated by the placenta. Glipizide, on the other hand, although a second-generation sulphonylurea like glibenclamide, was found to cross the placenta in small amounts that were significantly higher than glibenclamide. With these findings, there has been a rise in interest in the use of oral agents in pregnant diabetics, and most of the more recent studies involving sulphonylurea use in pregnancy have been done using glibenclamide.

 

            In a randomized, controlled trial by Langer et al, a comparison was made on the use of glibenclamide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes who were unable to achieve adequate metabolic control with diet and exercise alone. Four hundred and four women were randomly assigned to take either of the two treatments. The primary end point was the achievement of good glycaemic control and the secondary end points included maternal and neonatal complications. The result showed that 82%  of the glibenclamide group and 88%  of the  insulin group  achieved good glycaemic control, but there was less maternal hypoglycemia in the glibenclamide group 92%) as compared to the insulin group  ( 20%). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of pre-eclampsia, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia,   congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality, cord-serum insulin concentrations and the rate of Caesarean section. Moreover, glibenclamide was not detected in the cord serum of any infant in the glibenclamide group. This was a well-conducted randomized, controlled trial involving a large number of subjects making it a very significant study.

 

            In a recent prospective cohort study by Kramer et al, where 73 patients with gestational diabetes were treated with glibenclamide, 81% achieved satisfactory glucose control. This was similar to the proportion achieved by Langer et al. however; no anomalies were identified in all of the newborn infants. Although this was not a randomized, controlled trial and the number of subjects was quite small, it supports the findings of Langer.

 

Metformin:

 

            The use of metformin in pregnancy has been quite controversial with early reports of adverse effects in those exposed to this drug. However, with the advent of its use in the treatment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), it is postulated to alleviate key pathogenesis mechanisms such as hyperinsulinaemic insulin resistance, hyperandrogenaemia, and obesity which may cause miscarriages in women with PCOS. In fact, it is believed that decreasing hyperinsulinemia insulin resistance with metformin during pregnancy in women with the disorder would reduce the rate of early pregnancy loss; several studies have documented the beneficial effects and safety of metformin use in women with PCOS who became pregnant.

 

Metformin and Early Pregnancy Loss:   

            In a retrospective study by Jakubowicz et al, a comparison was   made between the pregnancies while taking metformin and remained on metformin throughout their pregnancy and the pregnancy outcomes of 31 women who also had PCOS but did not take metformin during pregnancy. The early pregnancy loss rate in the metformin group was only 8.8%, as compared to 41.9% in the control group (P<0.001).  In fact, the pregnancy loss rate of the metformin group was quite similar to the rate of 10% to 15% reported for clinically recognized pregnancies in normal women.  They also did a subset analysis of the women in each group with a prior history of miscarriage and found that the early pregnancy loss rate was only 11.1% in the metformin group, as compared to 58.3% in the control group (0=0.002). This shows that even in women with previous early pregnancy losses, metformin is still beneficial in preventing its recurrence. Although the number of subjects in this study was not very large, the percentage of reduction of early pregnancy loss with metformin was significantly high  and the benefits of using metformin were consistent between those with  and without a history of miscarriages as compared to those who did  not use metformin at all.            

 

Metformin and Insulin, insulin Resistance and Testosterone Levels:-

 

            Glueck et al did a prospective observational study of 42 pregnancies in women with PCOS who took metformin throughout their pregnancy. In this study, they examined the effects of metformin on maternal insulin levels, insulin resistance, insulin secretion and testosterone levels. They measured and compared the different parameters at the pre treatment and preconception baseline, at the last preconception visit on metformin and during the first, second and third trimesters on metformin. This study demonstrated that there was a median percentage reduction of 40% in serum insulin at the last preconception visit, which did not increase in the firs tor second trimester 9P>0.05), but rose only 10% in the third trimester. There was also a 46% median percentage reductions in insulin resistance at the last preconception visit with no significant increase (P=0.05), in the first, second or third trimester. Testosterone also decreased at the last preconception. Visit by 30% (P=0.01), but rose to 75%, 61% and 95% during the first, second and third trimesters respectively. However, the median testosterone level during the third trimester did not differ significantly from the pre-treatment levels. Therefore, by reducing the preconception insulin levels, insulin resistance, and testosterone levels, and by maintaining these insulin-sensitizing effects thought-out pregnancy, metformin reduces the likelihood of diabetes developing and prevents androgen excess for the fetus. These findings are consistent with metformin known effects on improving insulin resistance in non- pregnant diabetics.

 

Metformin and development of Gestational Diabetes:

 

            In a study by Glueck et al comparing 33 non- diabetic women with PCOS who were on metformin during pregnancy with 39 non-diabetic women with PCOS without metformin therapy during pregnancy, gestational diabetes developed in only 3% of the women who took metformin as compared to 27% of those who did not. Based on the number of pregnancies, gestational diabetes developed in only 1 out of the 33 pregnancies (3%) in those women who took metformin as compared to 14 out of 60 (23%) pregnancies in those who did not take metformin. In addition, there were no fetal malformations nor fetal hypoglycemia noted in the metformin group. In another study by the same authors, which compared 119 pregnant women with PCOS taking metformin with 251 healthy controls without PCOS, gestational diabetes occurred in 7.6% of the metformin group as compared to 15.9% of the controls (P=0.027).these results show that there is a significant reduction in the incidence of gestational diabetes with the use of metformin in pregnancy.

 

            In the first study, although there was a significant difference in the rates of gestational diabetes between users and non-users of metformin in women with PCOS, the sample sizes were generally small.  The subject in the second study were not evenly matched in terms of numbers between the study group and the controls, but, the interesting point is the comparison of the incidence of gestational diabetes between PCOS women taking metformin and healthy control subjects without PCOS.  Even though it is expected that women with PCOS will generally have a higher incidence of gestational diabetes because of the inherent insulin resistance when compared to healthy subjects, this study demonstrated a significantly lower rate of gestational diabetes in those with PCOS who took metformin when compared to the healthy controls. 

 

Metformin and Pre-eclampsia:

 

            In contrast to the earlier findings of Helmut et al which showed a high prevalence of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women taking metformin, Gluck et al showed that there was no significant difference in the rates of pre-eclampsia between those taking metformin (5.2%) and the controls (3.6%) (P=0.5) when they compared 97 pregnancies of women with PCOS taking metformin with 252 pregnancies of healthy women.  Even when they did a subgroup analysis comparing only pregnancies of primigravida in both groups, the incidence rate of pre-eclampsia was the same for both at 4.4% each. Ina further study by the same authors, 122 PCOS pregnancies taking metformin were compared to 252 pregnancies of healthy women without PCOS. The incidence of pre-eclampsia did not differ between the metformin group and the control group (4.1% vs 3.6%, P=0.8).

 

Metformin and Fetal Outcomes:

 

            Even in 1979, Coetzee et al from South Africa had already reported in a study of 33 metformin-treated pregnant women that infant morbidity was low and mortality rates were  not higher in the metformin-treated patients compared to insulin- treated patient  96/1000 vs 105/1000). The same authors also sowed in another study involving 171 pregnant women with established type 2 diabetes mellitus that the overall perinatal mortality was definitely lower in the metformin- treated group compared to the untreated group 9 42/1000 vs 264/1000).

 

            In 2 recent studies, one involving 126 infants and the other 100 infants, Gluck et al demonstrated that the use of metformin in pregnant women with PCOS did not increase the risk of developing major birth defects as compared to the USA national rate reported by the Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) (1.6% vs 1.9%), and therefore concluded that there was no evidence that metformin in teratogenic. The prematurity rate of infants was not significantly different from controls (20% vs 18%) and the birth weight percentiles were also similar between the neonates of metformin-treated PCOS patients and community controls. Moreover, they had neither second or third trimester fetal losses nor neonatal hypoglycemia. Jakubowicz et al also demonstrated in their study that of the 62 metformin-treated pregnant women with PCOS who had live births, all of the delivered neonates were normal with appropriate size for gestational age, except for 1 infant born with achondrodysplsia, which is an inherited disorder unlikely to be related to metformin therapy. 

 

Metformin and Infant Development:

 

            To further document metformin safety for use in pregnancy, Glueck et al prospectively assessed the growth and motor-social development during the first 18 months of life of 126 neonates born to 109 women with PCOS who conceived while taking metformin and continued taking it through their pregnancy. The lengths and weights of the metformin exposed infants were compared with gender-specific CDC infants over 18 month. There were also no motor-social developmental delays noted in the drug-exposed infants. The importance of this study lies in the fact that it shows no harmful effects of metformin on infants even beyond the neonatal period.

 

Acarbose:

 

            The use of acarbose in pregnancy seems to be a good option because it primarily acts in the gut by delaying carbohydrate absorption and is not absorbed, thereby having no systemic effects. However, this drug has not yet been studied well in pregnancy. In a small study by Zarate et al, 6 pregnant women with moderately elevated levels of fasting and postprandial blood glucose were treated with acarbose, after which, the fasting and postprandial glucose levels normalized. The pregnancies were uneventful and the newborn babies were normal. Although this study shows promising results, it is till a very early and small study on acarbose use in pregnancy, and therefore, no plausible and definitive conclusions can be drawn from it in terms of the safety and efficacy of acarbose use in gestational diabetes.  

 

Rosiglitazone:

 

            Rosiglitazone has not been recommended for use in pregnant women because it has been shown that treatment with the drug during mid to late gestation was associated with fetal death and growth retardation in animal models. It is classified as Category C by the Food and Drug Authority (FDA) for use in pregnancy, which means the risk of adverse outcomes cannot be ruled out. However, there have been 2 reported cases of rosiglitazone exposure during pregnancy. The first patient was a diabetic and hypertensive woman who took 4 mg/day of rosiglitazone for the first 7 weeks of gestation when she was not aware that she was pregnant. Her treatment was changed to insulin when the pregnancy was confirmed and she gave birth to a normal healthy infant at the 36th week of gestation. The second patient was a multigravida, diabetic woman who had been managed on diet and exercise alone, and had not received any drug therapy until the 13th week of her sixth pregnancy. She was started on rosiglitazone 4 mg/day from the 13th to the 17th week of gestation, during which she was discovered to be pregnant. Rosiglitazone was stopped and insulin was initiated. She delivered a healthy baby boy without any malformations on the 37th week of gestation. Although these 2 reports did not show any adverse effect from the brief exposure to rosiglitazone it would be difficult to make any conclusions regarding the safety of its use in pregnancy at the moment. 

 

            A study on the placental transfer of rosiglitazone in the first trimester of pregnancy was recently reported by Chan et al. In this study, rosiglitazone was given to 31 pregnant women between the 8th to 12th weeks of gestation who were undergoing surgical termination   of their pregnancy. Rosiglitazone was detected in 19 fetal samples 9 61.3%). This shows that there is a high risk of placental transfer and fetal exposure to the drug.

 

Conclusions:

 

            There is now a changing trend in the acceptability of using oral hypoglycemic agents in non-insulin dependent pregnant diabetics. Recent evidence (Table10 has shown that there are some oral hypoglycemic drugs which may be safe and, therefore, useful, especially for those who are only mildly to moderately hyperglycemic and who do not desire multiple daily insulin injections.  In some countries where the use of insulin may not always be possible, the option of using oral hypoglycemic agents may be particularly attractive.

 

            Among the sulphonylureas, only glibenclamide has been shown not to cross the placenta. Moreover, the best and strongest evidence available so far in terms of safety and efficacy is that of glibenclamide as sown in a randomized controlled  study involving a large number of subjects 9n=404) and a direct head –to-head comparison with the gold standard use of insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes. However, it would be reassuring to have more of such randomized controlled   studies comparing glibenclamide and insulin to confirm these findings.

 

            Metformin has been documented in several trials to be safe for use in pregnancy, and in fact, even beneficial in terms of decreasing the incidence of early pregnancy loss and the development of gestational diabetes, reducing insulin levels and insulin resistance, and preventing androgen excess in women with PCOS. However these studies had all been done on non-diabetics. Moreover, none of these studies had been randomized controlled trials and most of them involved relatively small number of subjects. 

 

            The efficacy of metformin in gestational diabetes is presumably attributed to its insulin sensitizing effects, thereby improving glucose control. However, there is no direct evidence yet from good studies documenting the safety of it use in patients with gestational diabetes. A large prospective, randomized controlled trial called “metformin in gestational diabetes. (MIG) “Comparing the use of metformin and insulin gestational diabetes is currently ongoing in New Zealand and Australia. This study will provide us with a significant basis to decide whether or not we should use metformin in gestational diabetes.

 

            Both glibenclamide and metformin are currently classified by the FDA as Category B drugs for use in pregnancy, which means that there is no evidence of risk in humans. With  the present safety profile of the 2 drugs, Langer proposed the following  treatment plan fro gestational diabetes medical nutrition for patients with a fasting blood glucose level of <95 mg/dl (5.3mmol/L), or HbA 1c of <7%: oral hypoglycemic agent therapy 9 glibenclamide and/or  metformin  ) or   a random blood glucose level of < 140 mg/dl 9 7.8 mmol/L, or a random blood glucose level of <140 mg/dl ( 7.8 mmol/L, or HbA 1c of > 8%: and insulin therapy for a fasting blood glucose level of>140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L , or a random blood glucose level of >180 mg/dl ( 10mml/L), or a random blood glucose level of >180 mg/dl 9 10 mmol/L, or Hba 1c of >12%. However, the ranges of the blood sugar levels and HbA 1c values that determine the  specific  treatment option in this treatment plan  are not very clear and well-defined, and the threshold for the HbA 1c value to stat  insulin treatment is quite high ( HbA 1c >12%). Therefore, we suggest the treatment plan for gestational diabetes to be as illustrated in figure 1. 

 

            Acarbose shows promise in its use for gestational diabetes because this drug is not absorbed in the gut significantly and, therefore, has no systemic effects. However, with just one small study, it is still too early to determine how effective and safe this drug is for treating gestational diabetes. As with the other oral hypoglycemic agents, large randomized  controlled trials with head-to head comparison with other oral agents and insulin will help determine the sue of acarbose for gestational diabetes. This drug is also currently classified as Category B by the FDA for use in pregnancy.

 

            Oral hypoglycemic agents, which have been previously regarded as unsafe for pregnancy are being re-evaluated for their use in non-insulin dependent pregnant diabetics. Most of the evidence available so for suggests that some of these drugs, when used in their normal non-pregnancy doses, may be safe and beneficial women with gestational diabetes. However, further well-conducted, large-scale clinical studies will be needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these drugs for use in   pregnant diabetics and to gather widespread acceptability in the medical community. At present, we still advocate caution in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancy, and one should always consider the benefits and risks of giving these drugs.

 

Table 1, Selected Studies Using Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Pregnancy:

 

Drugs                     Authors                  Years     Number Study design                        Outcomes

Glibenclamide      Langer et al          2000       404         RCT                        Glyburide’s was comparable to

(Glyburide)                                                                                                            insulin in the cont-

l                                               role of blood sugar levels. There were no       signifi-

Cant differences in the neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.

 

Kremer et al          2004       73           Prospective           No congenital anomalies were

found in the neonates of those treated with glyburide.

 

Metformin              Jakubowicz et al  2002       96           Retrospective       Reduced the rate of early

pregnancy loss in women with PCOS.

 

Gluck et al             2002       70           Prospective           Reduced the development of

gestational And Retrospective diabetes in women with PCOS with no fetal Malformations in the neonates of the treated subjects.

 

                                Gluck et al             2004       42           Prospective           Reduced preconception insulin

levels, insulin resistance and testosterone levels while maintaining insulin-sensitizing effects throughout pregnancy.

 

                                Gluck et al             2004       349         Prospective           No significant difference in pre-

eclampsia rates between treatment and control groups.

 

 

                                Gluck et al             2004       126         prospective           No systematic differences in growth

between the drug-exposed and non-exposed infants. There were also no motor-social developmental delays noted in the infants of treated subjects.

 

Acarbose               Zarate et al            2000       6              Prospective           Bloods sugar levels were

adequately controlled.  The pregnancies were uneventful and the newborn babies were normal.

 

References

1)            Yogev Y. Langer O. The use of anti-hyperglycemic agents in pregnancy, Fetal Matern Med Rev 2004. 15: 133-43.

2)            Smith berg M, Runner MN. Teratogenic effects of hypoglycemic treatments in inbred strains of mice. Am J Anat 1963: 113: 479-89.

3)            Smoak IW.  Embryopathy effects of the oral hypoglycemic agent chlorpropamide in cultured mouse embryos. Am J Obst Gynecol 1993. 169. 409-14.

4)            Denno KM, Sadler TW. Effects of the biguanide class of oral hypoglycemic agents on mouse embryogenesis. Teratology 1994:49:260-66

5)            Campbell GD. Chlorpropamide and fetal damage. BMJ 1963:1:59:-60

6)            Larsson Y, Sterky G. Possible teratogenic effect of tolbutamide in a pregnant  Prediabetic. Lancer 1960:2:142-6

7)            Notelovitz M. Sulphonylurea therapy in the treatment of the pregnant diabetic. S Afr Med j 1971:45:226:9

8)            Zucker P, Simon g. Prolonged symptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia associated with maternal chlorpropamide therapy. Pediatrics 1968: 4242:824-5

9)            Kemball ML, McIver C, Milner RD, Nurse CH, Schiff d, Tiernan JR, Neonatal hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers given sulphonylurea drugs in pregnancy. Arch Dis child 1970:45:696-701.

10)         Hellumth E, Damm P, Molested-Pedersen L, Oral Hypoglycemic agents in 118 diabetic pregnancies. Diabetes Med 2000, 17:507-11.

11)         Elliot BD, Langeer O, Schenker S, Johnson RF, Insignificant transfer of glyburide occurs across the human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991:165:807-12.

12)         Langer O, Conway DL, Berkus MD, Xenakis EM, Gonzales O.A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2000:343:1134-8

13)         Kremer CJ, Duff P. Glyburide for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004:190:1438-9

14)         Jakubovicw DJ, Journo MJ, Jakubowicz S, Roberts KA, Nestler JE. Effects of metformin on early pregnancy loss in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002:87:524-9

15)         glueck CJ, Goldenberg N, Wang P, Loft spring M, Sheman a. Metformin during pregnancy reduces insulin, insulin resistance, insulin secretion, weight, testosterone and development of gestational diabetes: prospective longitudinal assessment of women with polycystic ovary syndrome from preconception throughout pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2004:19:510:-21.

16)         Glueck CJ, Wang P, Kobayyashi S, Phillips H, Sieve Smith L. Metformin therapy throughout pregnancy reduces the development of gestational diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2002:77:520-5

17)         Glueck CH, Goldenberg N, Pranikoff J, Lofspring M, Sieve L, Wang P. Height, weight, and motor-social development during the first 18 months of life in 126 infants born to 109 mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome who conceived on and continued metformin through pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2004:19:1323-30

18)         Blueck CJ, Bornovali s, Pranikoff J, Goldenberg N, Dharashivkar S, Wang P. Metformin, Pre-eclampsia  and pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, Diabet Med 204:21:829-36.

19)         Coetzee EJ, Jackson WP. Metformin in management of pregnant insulin-independent diabetics. Diabetologia 1979:16:241-5

20)         Coetzee EJ, Jackson WP. Pregnancy in established non-insulin-dependent diabetics. A five- and –a-half year study at Groote Schuur Hospital. S Afr Med j 1980:58:795-802.

21)         Zarate A, Ochoa R, Hernandez M, Basurto L, Effectiveness of acarbose in the control of glucose tolerance worsening in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Med 2000:68-42-5

22)         Yaris F, Yaris E, Kadiogluy M, Ulu c, Esim M, Kalyonec NI. Normal pregnancy outcome following inadvertent exposure to rosiglitazone, Gliclazide, and atorvastatin in a diabetic and hypertensive woman. Reprod Toxicol 2004:18:619-21.

23)         Kalyoncu NI, Yaris, F, Ulku c, Kadioglu M, Kesim M, Unsal M, Et al. A case of rosiglitazone exposure in the second trimester of pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2005:19:563-4.

24)         Chan LY, Young JH, Lau TK, Placental transfer of rosiglitazone in the first trimester of human pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2005:83:955-8

25)         Simmons D, Walters BN, Rowan JA, McIntyre HD, Metformin therapy and diabetes in pregnancy. Med J August 2004:180:462-4

26)         Drug Facts and Comparison 2003. St. Louis, MO: Facts & Comparisons Ltd, 2003.

27)         Physicians Desk Reference 2003. Montvale, NJ, Thompson, 2003.

28)         Langer O. Gestational diabetes and Oral Hypoglycemic agents. OBG management 2003:15:62-76.

29)         Langer O. When diet tails: insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents as alternative for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002:11:218-25.

30)         Langer O. Insulin and other treatment alternatives in gestational diabetes mellitus. Prenatal Neonatal Med 1998:3:542-9

31)         Langer O. Oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancy: their time has come. J Matern Fetal neonatal med 2002:12:376-83.  

   
 

Home | Invitation Articles | PG Classroom | My Recent Lectures | User's Corner | I have recently read | Write ups | Orations | Get Inspired | Books Published | Contact Us

  Developed by Chhutki Infotech

 

                                                                                    Copyright © 2008 Dr. Pankaj Desai, All Rights reserved