INTRODUCTION:
The discovery of pharmacologic agents that can be estrogenic in
some tissues and antiestrogenic in others has led to intense
activity in better understanding of the mechanism by which
molecular structure interacts with cellular receptors to
selectively affect DNA transcription in different organs. This
concept has given a major boost in research work for menopausal
management with the hope of developing and agent that could
confer all the benefits of estrogen without any of its risks.
DEFINITION:
SERMs(Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators) are structurally
diverse compounds that bind the estrogen receptors (ER) and
elicit agonist or antagonist responses depending on the target
tissues and hormonal milieu1.
They as also often referred to as “Tissue Specific Estrogens” or
“Designer Estrogens”. In addition to tissue specific variance in
estrogen agonist and antagonist action, the agonist- antagonist
profile of a SERMs may vary depending on a women‘s endogenous
estrogen milieu, therefore findings noted in post menopausal
women should not necessarily be generalized to premenopausal
women.
HISTORY:
SERMs have been available for clinical use since the late 1960s.
By the late 1980s, several SERMs had become available that
influenced clinical practice. Multi-organ effects of these
compounds include variable clinical efficacy for treatment of
menopausal symptoms involving the central nervous system,
variable effects on the genitourinary tract, and, in general,
positive effects on serum lipid levels2. Recent advance in
molecular biology and identification of atleast two (ERα and ERβ
receptors) have resulted in development SERMs.
The concept of SERM evolved in the pursuit of research for “Anti
Estrogens” like clomiphene & Tamoxifen etc. Tamoxifen was tried
initially and discarded for its use in menopausal management due
to high incidence of endometrial proliferation and endometrial
malignancy.
THE GROUP:
Although the term selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)
is loosely defined and the underlying mechanism of action
remaining unclear, this class of drugs may include:
A) A 19- Nor testosterone derivative: Tibolone
B) Non-steroidal Benzothiophene compounds like Reloxifene and
its analogues
C) Newer triphenylethylene derivatives such as Droloxifene,
Toremifene, Idoxifene Levomeloxifiene, Ormeloxifene.
POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF ACTION:
A) Differences in binding affinities to the estrogen receptor.
B) Differential changes in estrogen receptor structure after
ligand binding.
C) Affects transcriptional regulation by the estrogen
receptors (ERα and ERβ) but show different effects in different
tissues3.
RALOXIFENE:
Raloxifene is the most extensively studied molecule in SERMs. As
shown in table I, it shows estrogen agonist effects on the
skeleton and lipids resulting in significant reduction in
fracture rates and favourable lipid profile. Furthermore, this
selective estrogen receptor modulator may enable dissociation of
estrogen risks and benefits 4.
On the other hand it exerts estrogen antagonistic effects on
breast and uterine tissues resulting in protective effects on
their malignancies. Raloxifene did not have any detectable
effect on the parathyroid hormone set-point. An effect on
non-suppressible PTH secretion cannot be excluded as of today3.
Raloxifene does not relieve menopausal symptoms such as hot
flushes. Possible effects on cardiovascular system and CNS have
not been clearly identified.
Raloxifene is used in the does of 60-120mg/day with remarkable
safety. The side effects are mild and include hot flushes, mild
leg cramps and occasionally vaginal discharge.
Most serous risk of Raloxifene is three fold increase in venous
thremboembolism.
CONCLUSION:
Although the role of SERMs in the treatment of breast cancer and
that of Reloxifene in prevention of osteoporosis is well
established, their proposed use as an alternative to HRT in
healthy postmenopausal women is unsubstantiated. The
risk-benefit ratio of the emerging SERMs needs to be better
defined & evaluated.
The clinical use of SERMs has yet to demonstrate the beneficial
effects shown with HRT on all cause mortality, colon cancer, CNS
(i.e. risk of Alzheimer’s disease, improved cognition).
As many menopausal women seek medical help due to symptoms like
hot flushes exacerbation of these symptoms due to Raloxifene &
other SERMs makes them unpopular too.
In spite of this hot debate it is very certain that SERMs have
opened up a new world of tissue specific agents that will go a
long way improving the find of agents that would have precisely
executed effects and in turn make life better.
REFERENCES:
-
Boker V. L. Jaffe R. B. Clinical Uses of anti
estrogens: Obst.& Gynec. Survey: 1996;51;45-59.
-
Whitaker MD: Selective estrogen receptor modulators: from
bench to bedside and back: Endocr Pract 2001 Mar-Apr; 7(2):
113-9
-
Oleksik A, Duong T, Popp-Snijders C, Pliester N, Asma G,
Lips P: Effects of the selective estrogen receptor
modulator-raloxifene-on calcium and PTH secretory dynamics
in women with osteoporosis: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001 May;
54(5):575-82
-
Wenger N K: Hormonal and Non-hormonal Therapies for the
Postmenopausal Woman: What is the Evidence for Cardio
protection? Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2000 Jul; 9(4): 204-209
TABLE 1
CURRENT STATUS OF
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CERTAIN IMPORTANT SERMs |
Generic Name |
Current Indication |
Tamoxifen |
Adjuvant therapy Ca-Breast |
Reloxifene |
Prevention of osteoporosis
(USFDA approved for this indication) |
Toremifene |
Treatment of metastatic breast cancer |
Ormeloxephene |
Dysfunction uterine Bleeding |
Droloxifene
Idoxifene |
Stage III Clinical Trials;
Approval awaited
|
TABLE 2
TISSUE SELECTIVE ESTROGENIC EFFECTS OF
RALOXIFENE |
Tissue |
Agonistic |
Antagonistic |
Uncertain |
Skeleton |
++ |
- |
---- |
Lipids |
++ |
--- |
---- |
Hemostasis |
++ |
--- |
--- |
Breast |
--- |
++ |
--- |
Uterus |
--- |
++ |
--- |
Vasomotor |
--- |
++ |
--- |
Ovary |
--- |
--- |
+ |
Pituitary gland & Brain. |
--- |
--- |
+ |
|